Subdue wrote:
Ok. It's just SC1 with better graphics. Sooooooooooo... meh
Pretty much how I feel about the SP atm. I give it an 80 overall, though I haven't dealt with MP much (I suck at RTS games, but do enjoy the gameplay). I don't really want to ruin it, but the storyline seems very cliché. It is fun, does last awhile, but just so predictable imo. I haven't been able to notice any new mechanics (doesn't include units) since SC1, such as all units move the same speed as the slowest in the group, pathing, coveresque system, etc.
There are some new additions though, such as co-op (friends vs AI) and Challenge Mode, where you are given a set of tasks and try to get Gold. Things such as using only hotkeys to last as long as you can against enemies or setting up given units against specific enemies to try and counter. The single player also has 3 achievements per level, for replayability, along with overall story achievements.
All-in-all, I think if some other studio created the same exact game, with different names, units, skins/models, etc., not many people would look twice at it. Reviewers would be hitting the 80-90 mark saying how it doesn't incorporate anything new developed over the past 10 years. If you don't care much about the Multiplayer, not worth the $60 imo.